Xiaohua Huang v. MediaTek U.S. is a nonprecedential case decided on June 3, 2020 on appeal from the Northern District of California. After denying Plaintiff Huang’s motion for sanctions, a TRO, and a preliminary injunction, the district court struck Huang’s fourth set of infringement contentions for failing to comply the local patent rules. The district court dismissed the case with prejudice as this was Huang’s fourth set of defective infringement contentions. Huang appealed.
The Federal Circuit affirmed the decisions striking Huang’s contentions, dismissing the action with prejudice, and denying Huang’s motion for sanctions and injunctive relief.
Many people have been “programmed” with a mental software that needs to viagra super active thought about that be deleted. It is thus known as; a healthy mouth is a tadalafil 20mg for women healthy life. For erectile process, a healthy supply of blood is needed order generic levitra to penile chambers. Indulge in http://www.slovak-republic.org/citizenship/ for sale viagra your favorite hobbies.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Huang’s motion for injunctive relief. “Huang has not asserted, let alone established, a likelihood of success or that he would likely suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction.” “Indeed, beyond generally asserting the need to protect the public interest,” Huang “does not address the remaining three factors that a movant must establish to obtain injunctive relief.”